With some imprecision (Felt was managing director and now managing editor, probably the change was made in anticipation of his sentencing order and not to affect the output of the newspaper) and a few more questions (I do not think Mr Berlusconi did not pay his salary for three months), but the record and the following considerations, taken by cosnigliera Antonella Cardone, are right. And I share them on FB and on my blog. I would add the phrase "known homosexual attention from the police," proved false, contained in anti-Boffo campaign, which strikes me as the most disgusting of all.
Antonella Cardone's note at the link below and
http://www.facebook.com/home.php? # / Note.php? Note_id = 447925182561 & notif_t =
like Felt and the condemnation of the Order, a little 'truth of the facts, because it's crap many are turning ... published by Antonella Cardone on Friday, November 12, 2010 at 16:56
know that I was categorically forbidden to disclose anything to what happens in the sessions of the National Order of Journalists Conisglio, but here we must explain how their things are.
1) Felt was sopeso for three months from the profession, means that in this period does not receive salary and contributions and editorial director as if he was up all'altroieri The Associated Press could not go out for three months having no more than a professional journalist at the top. This case will be created because Felt had resigned from the role a few weeks ago.
2) Felt is not gagged by the Order, the freedom of the press is not at issue because it can go on TV and write in the newspaper saying its like a normal citizen can do, as guaranteed by the Constitution.
3) The possible penalties for violations of conduct (and again in hand igiornalisti ALL the books that are designed to take the state exam, but since I read the Directors propose a fine of authoritative economic, touch me) are the following:
warning
complaint
suspension
radiation
4) In my memory disbarred for journalists unworthiness are: Renato Farina regularly because he was salaried by the secret services and that Mr Smith had made out his wife a colleague (technically, because before he had launched a smear campaign against his colleague, by law we are required to maintain good relations with the rest of us)
5) Felt had been convicted on the case Boffo Order Lombard six months, compared this has been used and the case came to national because he objected to that decision
6) In the case Felts has expressed the judiciary, as required by law, shall be binding on the cases that we deal with there is the opinion (not mandatory but almost always followed) by an Attorney General who had found the right sentence to sopsensione suggesting forcing them
7) Felt was convicted of violation of ethics in relation to the readers (and also being a member Boffo, also affected by the statutory provision on the obligation of good relations between colleagues)
8) Felt was convicted on these points, all purely technical:
publication, with huge importance of the news the next day turned out to be already partially false
the lack of adequate control over the veracity of
the delay in publication of the article repairer, which occurred three months after the events
the publication of a correction, not by law (the law provides for exactly how to do correction)
9) translated into Italian, full-page shot at first, then giving out page 2 and 3, a partially false news (it's true that Boffo was convicted of harassment is that harassment were false made to the wife of her lover, and this was released the next day, all other newspapers), violating the duty of good information to readers.
When she arrived Boffo Advocate of the amendment request, only then was made a sort of a letter of apology. Thought so: a reply, signed only with initials to the letter of a letrice. Beginning in the first pages, the end on page 40. By law, the adjustment would have to shoot full-page at first, just as had happened at the news partly false
10) The Order of National Law may only confirm, cancel or reduce the penalties laid down by the regional order not may impose their own.
11) The day before our meeting to decide the case on Felt 80 Members of Italian Parliament (all of the center) have made a public letter asking us to set aside the conviction (alone you realize the gravity of the thing)
12) out of 150 National Councillors, the team which is recognized as the left has 50 advisers, accounts for one third
13 ) a sentence of three months was voted by 66 advisers, in a question like this: "sentenced to six months, or sentenced to three months?". The other 66 had voted for a sentence of 6 months. So all the directors agreed to a suspension (violation of professional ethics are irrefutable), the division was on what. E 'stat aanche voted the proposal to impose censorship (equivalent to a pat on the shoulder, as a punishment), which was okay only 50 advisors
14) the National Council are journalists, but also lawyers, magistrates, dentists, mailman (representing the journalists), all democratically elected by fellow journalists (and lawyers and dentists) that the elections are held every 3 years (there is a nomination from the sky, in short).
15) Felt precedent for ethics violations (for the publication of alleged pedophiles fotosu)
16) It 'obvious that in this case there are no political influence (he has also written to Parliament to tell us how their seocondo we had to vote) but both the internal debate that the decision was taken at the tip of law, for questions which I explained in point 8.
17) if Felt is punished for this and the Republic for Berlusconi no, it appeals to the Republic because there are none. But you can do if someone is a privatocittadino) made a complaint, we will discuss them when they reach
0 comments:
Post a Comment