" It 's true that man is the king of beasts, for his brutality exceeds theirs. We are living through the death of others. At an early age I used to deny cibarmi meat ... "
Despite efforts to hide the man to himself the truth, reality is only one (and prove later): we are not carnivores. scrupulously analyzing the human body and its digestive processes, one can only reach this conclusion.
To give an idea of \u200b\u200bhypocrisy 'Man and the comedy that puts in place to conceal the truth, just think - if only for a moment - on the way that eats meat. The man is forced to disguise this food - not compatible with your body - with an endless amount of sauces and Salsette, not before it fried or boiled or aged, and transformed in many ways.
He is not aware of being ridiculous?
If indeed man is a carnivore (as many, if not many, I believe), why not eat meat like any other true carnivores, and that is cruel? It would be worth asking from time to time this kind of questions, without giving everything for granted and without relying on other people's opinions at face value.
Many biologists and physiologists are agreed that man, in fact, physiologically is not "built" to eat meat, and offer very convincing evidence. We see such a class of carnivorous predation has a physical structure (claws, canines developed), short bowel (only 3 times the length of the trunk) and strongly acidic (10 times more than your average herbivore), and the short bowel along the trunk three times, is to avoid too long a break of ingested meat, because it is easily rot. The short intestine also is strongly acidic because it has to neutralize the toxic meat batter.
Let's see how is the digestion of meat: once the meat has reached the stomach needs to be digested, secretion of gastric juices rich in acid hydrochloride. Carnivores, in fact, secrete large amounts of hydrochloric acid, used to dissolve the bones. The intestinal tract where it is the last part of digestion, which serves to pass the nourishing elements in the blood, must inevitably be less as long as possible: it must be considered, in fact, that the meat is nothing but a corpse putrefaction creates poisonous wastes in the body. The carnivore, therefore, must get rid of as soon as possible. The problem for non-carnivores, is the length of the intestinal tract, which is sometimes even 20 times along the trunk. If non-carnivores eat meat, this would in their body too much time poisoning them.
Let the class of herbivores : physical structure strong but not aggressive, with no real teeth to bite into fruits upper incisors, and canines to tear, gut lengths of up to 20 times the trunk, digestive enzyme that can transform and assimilate plant cells. Herbivores secrete a small amount of hydrochloric acid, not enough to digest all the meat .
Then there is the class of omnivorous, carnivorous kin, who retain a degree of aggressiveness and physical characteristics are similar in many meat eaters, and many, for example, not place the dog between the carnivores, because if it is nourished by one flesh dies.
Now look at the man : physical structure of non-aggressive, long-tract 12 times the length of the trunk, weak jaws and pronounced fit salivary secretion (due to ptyalin) starches of cereals, teeth developed especially in the teeth to bite and bite into fruits and dishes and robust molars to grind seeds, and little weak stomach acid, which does not possess the appropriate enzymes to neutralize toxic substances produced by the decomposition of the flesh , also has his intestines need to stimuli that promote peristaltic movement: fruits, grains and vegetables have these capabilities, no meat. The large intestine, also, to optimize its function must have an acid content: seeds, roots and fruit acids residues left in the large intestine, while the meat leaving alkaline residues: ammonia and other bases. Physiologically, man is more similar to eating plants and animals from grazing and fodder (such as monkeys, elephants and cows) than to carnivores such as tigers and leopards. Carnivores, for example, do not breathe through the skin: the body temperature is regulated with rapid breathing and extrusion of the tongue. Vegetarian animals, however, have sweating pores to remove impurities and adjust the temperature.
All coincidences?
Carnivores must lap liquids (eg cats), while animals vegetarians suck liquids through his teeth, as well as men.
It seems that man does not belong to either class of carnivores, or omnivores in that, contrary to some physical characteristics could be compared to frugivorous (like monkeys) and to a lesser extent granivorous (squirrels and mice). Here's why: the man has a hand hanging like monkeys and rodents, such as to grasp and pick fruits and rounded objects. If we consider the placenta, the human is discoid, such as of apes. It therefore seems that man has the food of choice seeds, fruits, vegetables and vegetables.
What conclusion should we draw from this brief analysis of science?
0 comments:
Post a Comment