Today, Sunday, May 30, the voting ballot for the election of national and regional directors of the Order of Journalists. Voting is an absurd law, a majority two-round, even the French policies were, in almost two Sundays in summer, at times worse than the banks and postal services - from 10 to 18 - in five cities in our region: Bologna, Rimini, Ravenna, Reggio Emilia and Piacenza. Someone who like me is in San Giovanni in Persiceto must lose three hours, take car + bus + walk to vote in Strada Maggiore 6. Think of someone who's in Modena that if he wants to vote has to go to Reggio Emilia, between Parma and Piacenza, from Ferrara to Ravenna, Forlì and Cesena in Rimini. They say the law is so that you can not do otherwise, which already has made an exception to the rule to make rate in five cities instead of only in Bologna. But looking to other regions we find that for "tearing the rule" there are thousands and who knows how many we can still do. In different regions of the elections were concluded with only one shift. In Lazio is voted on Sunday morning and Monday afternoon to 21.30. And so on. In any case, it takes a lot to change its this absurd election law, if not to allow at least one electronic voting by mail, as now you can also do the policies? And it is so difficult in a parliament full of journalists submit a sneaky change to the mechanism? And if you do, I wonder, why? Who benefits from this system if not to keep those packages with a few tens or hundreds of votes continue to be there for a lifetime? And (not) be the category? Who benefits if you do not keep these little pockets of power and status quo?
If elected will certainly be the first thing I will try to better understand and change. Also because, despite the added value and the pressure data from the precarious voter turnout (how many would have voted without this presence?), turnout among the professionals was less than 20% and among the publicists of 7-8%. Where an order is followed by a professional journalist just out of 5?
In any case, whatever happens today, I propio glad I accepted the nomination of the Coordination precarious Emilia-Romagna. It 'was a great experience and a better campaign. These guys have the initiative, ideas, extraordinary energy: they make you think again about so many clichés about "gggiovani ... And they have reasons to sell: you make a deck with a passion and a dream for little money and no safeguards. And even manage to find ways and time to build up from nothing this little 'bit of movement, motivated and involved, which has a head and legs, pale face that seems to me the policy of those dark times. Whatever happens in the end, therefore - and I believe will turn out well - for the Coordination will be a success, and for me it will be worth it.
In recent days, following the success in many ways surprising first-round, with the candidates ahead of the precarious ale preferences, even with three publications in the run-off area has always been the spoils of war of Catholics who were the first full turn, have alerted many tummy aches among the "senators" and old "lobbies." I also got some evil, and some comments (or silence) of colleagues, including estimated I did not like. All this, however, reinforces my conviction that the program of "rupture" of the Coordination and innovation is the right path to pursue. The strength of the Coordination and these guys are in their "naive" full of passion. Should be protected from compromised this office, carried out with determninazione this novelty, without being incorporated by the logic of those who say to stay on this side only for your convenience, indefinitely to harness, put the brakes and gags. The agreement with the union Asher was positive (after all, a union that does not open to the casual who now represent half of the class in this region, which union is it?), Was observed sostanzialemte the precarious and possibly be developed. Remembering that so far neither the union nor the Order did much for the protection of the least protected. So I think that what matters is 3:00 to 4:00 set concrete targets to defend the category and in particular the weakest part of the class, and move forward on those rights, challenging the conservatives (not of age but of ideas) of each membership measure. Then we'll see what will
0 comments:
Post a Comment